1976 Lancia Beta vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Lancia Beta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Lancia Beta (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Lancia Beta should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Lancia Beta weights approximately 266 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Lancia Beta (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1976 Lancia Beta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Lancia Beta | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Lancia | Zastava |
| Model | Beta | 102 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1036 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2160 mm |
