1976 Lancia Gamma vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Lancia Gamma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Lancia Gamma would be higher. At 2,484 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Lancia Gamma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1976 Lancia Gamma. (138 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1976 Lancia Gamma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Lancia Gamma (208 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1976 Lancia Gamma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Lancia Gamma | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Gamma | 5 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2484 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 208 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102.2 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.9 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |