1976 Land Rover Serie III vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1981 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Land Rover Serie III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Land Rover Serie III would be higher. At 2,292 cc (2 cylinders), 1981 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Land Rover Serie III weights approximately 250 kg more than 1981 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1976 Land Rover Serie III is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Land Rover Serie III will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Land Rover Serie III | 1981 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
| Model | Serie III | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1981 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2286 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2620 mm |
