1976 Lotus Eclat vs. 2013 Audi A6
To start off, 2013 Audi A6 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Audi A6 weights approximately 624 kg more than 1976 Lotus Eclat.
Because 2013 Audi A6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Lotus Eclat. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Lotus Eclat | 2013 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Lotus | Audi |
| Model | Eclat | A6 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1973 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1674 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4925 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2086 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1468 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2912 mm |
