1976 Maserati Khamsin vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Maserati Khamsin. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Maserati Khamsin would be higher. At 4,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Maserati Khamsin is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Maserati Khamsin weights approximately 555 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 1976 Maserati Khamsin is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Maserati Khamsin. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Maserati Khamsin | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Maserati | Mazda |
Model | Khamsin | 3 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 4899 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2650 mm |