1976 Mazda 616 vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (83 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 35 kg more than 1976 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda 616 (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (118 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1976 Mazda 616 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda 616 | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
Model | 616 | Polo |
Year Released | 1976 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1423 cc |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.1 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 77.4 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 945 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2410 mm |