1976 Mazda 616 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Uplander
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,880 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Uplander (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 1450 kg more than 1976 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Uplander (325 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Uplander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda 616 | 2009 Chevrolet Uplander | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | 616 | Uplander |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 3880 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 2360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3080 mm |