1976 Mazda 616 vs. 2012 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2012 Dodge Ram is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 6,690 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Ram (350 HP @ 3013 RPM) has 271 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1627 kg more than 1976 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Ram (827 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 703 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda 616 | 2012 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Mazda | Dodge |
Model | 616 | Ram |
Year Released | 1976 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 6690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3013 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 827 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 2537 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 4080 mm |