1976 Mazda 818 vs. 2009 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC90 (232 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 818.
Because 2009 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Mazda 818. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo XC90 (236 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda 818 | 2009 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 818 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2650 mm |