1976 Mazda 818 vs. 2010 Audi A3
To start off, 2010 Audi A3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A3 (140 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 818.
Because 1976 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda 818 | 2010 Audi A3 | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | 818 | A3 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1272 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2578 mm |