1976 Mazda 929 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 642 kg more than 1976 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda 929 | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | 929 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1976 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 98.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 86.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 8.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1074 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2700 mm |