1976 Mazda 929 vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Mazda 929 weights approximately 44 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda 929 (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1976 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda 929 | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 929 | Clio |
Year Released | 1976 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1074 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |