1976 Mazda 929 vs. 2008 Volvo C70
To start off, 2008 Volvo C70 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo C70 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo C70 weights approximately 618 kg more than 1976 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo C70 (230 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda 929 | 2008 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 929 | C70 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1074 kg | 1692 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 190 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 62 L |