1976 Mazda 929 vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda 929 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 101 kg more than 1976 Mazda 929.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Clio (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda 929 | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 929 | Clio |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 17.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1074 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 55 L |