1976 Mazda 929 vs. 2010 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2010 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Daewoo Rezzo (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 225 kg more than 1976 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Daewoo Rezzo (142 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 929. (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Mazda 929 | 2010 Daewoo Rezzo | |
| Make | Mazda | Daewoo |
| Model | 929 | Rezzo |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 103 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1347 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |
