1976 Mazda 929 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (318 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 704 kg more than 1976 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS (372 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda 929 | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | 929 | CTS |
Year Released | 1976 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 372 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1074 kg | 1778 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 68 L |