1976 Mazda Chante vs. 1980 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1980 Holden Commodore is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda Chante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda Chante would be higher. At 3,298 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Holden Commodore (111 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1976 Mazda Chante. (30 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda Chante. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Holden Commodore weights approximately 770 kg more than 1976 Mazda Chante. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Holden Commodore (231 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda Chante. (40 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1980 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda Chante.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Mazda Chante | 1980 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | Chante | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 3298 cc |
| Horse Power | 30 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 231 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 490 kg | 1260 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2670 mm |
