1976 Mazda Chante vs. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda Chante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda Chante would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1976 Mazda Chante. (30 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda Chante. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 1251 kg more than 1976 Mazda Chante. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda Chante. (40 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda Chante.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Mazda Chante | 2010 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
| Model | Chante | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 358 cc | 2400 cc |
| Horse Power | 30 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque | 40 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 490 kg | 1741 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2858 mm |
