1976 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1957 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1976 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1957 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1957 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 120 kg more than 1976 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Mazda Cosmo | 1957 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | Cosmo | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2540 mm |
