1976 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1981 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1981 Zastava 850 K is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 235 kg more than 1981 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda Cosmo | 1981 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Mazda | Zastava |
Model | Cosmo | 850 K |
Year Released | 1976 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 848 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2010 mm |