1976 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2006 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 207 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2006 Peugeot 207. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Because 1976 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Peugeot 207 (160 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda Cosmo. (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2006 Peugeot 207 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda Cosmo | 2006 Peugeot 207 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | Cosmo | 207 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1358 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1670 mm |