1976 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Because 1976 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda Cosmo (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1976 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda Cosmo | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Cosmo | Clio |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 76.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 50 L |