1976 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2010 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Fluence (110 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1976 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Fluence weights approximately 135 kg more than 1976 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda Cosmo | 2010 Renault Fluence | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Cosmo | Fluence |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 110 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4618 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1809 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2702 mm |