1976 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2011 Lincoln MKZ
To start off, 2011 Lincoln MKZ is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Lincoln MKZ is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Lincoln MKZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda Cosmo | 2011 Lincoln MKZ | |
Make | Mazda | Lincoln |
Model | Cosmo | MKZ |
Year Released | 1976 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1443 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2728 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 66 L |