1976 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2012 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2012 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Proton Gen-2 (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1976 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Proton Gen-2 should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda Cosmo (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1976 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Mazda Cosmo | 2012 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Mazda | Proton |
| Model | Cosmo | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2610 mm |
