1976 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1994 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1994 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1994 Volkswagen Polo. (75 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1994 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Volkswagen Polo. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1976 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda RX-2 | 1994 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
Model | RX-2 | Polo |
Year Released | 1976 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2410 mm |