1976 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1999 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 1999 SsangYong Korando is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 1999 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 118 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 870 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1999 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 SsangYong Korando (256 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda RX-2 | 1999 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
Model | RX-2 | Korando |
Year Released | 1976 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 256 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2490 mm |