1976 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2001 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2001 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2001 Nissan X-Trail. (112 HP @ 2000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 640 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Because 2001 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2001 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Mazda RX-2 | 2001 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | RX-2 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1600 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2540 mm |
