1976 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2005 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2005 Nissan Almera is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 118 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Almera weights approximately 170 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Almera (162 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Almera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda RX-2 | 2005 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | RX-2 | Almera |
Year Released | 1976 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1769 cc |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1130 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2540 mm |