1976 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 486 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Mazda RX-2 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | RX-2 | Condor |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1446 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2660 mm |
