1976 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2011 Mazda 3
To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2011 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda 3.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1976 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda RX-2 | 2011 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | RX-2 | 3 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2639 mm |