1976 Mazda RX-3 vs. 1977 Volvo 66
To start off, 1977 Volvo 66 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Mazda RX-3 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1977 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda RX-3 | 1977 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-3 | 66 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1106 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1390 mm |