1976 Mazda RX-3 vs. 1995 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 1995 SsangYong Musso is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 1995 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1995 SsangYong Musso. (94 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1995 SsangYong Musso. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 905 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Because 1995 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Mazda RX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 SsangYong Musso (192 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda RX-3 | 1995 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
Model | RX-3 | Musso |
Year Released | 1976 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1755 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1740 mm |