1976 Mazda RX-3 vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 1999 Acura CL is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura CL (150 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura CL weights approximately 730 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Mazda RX-3 | 1999 Acura CL | |
| Make | Mazda | Acura |
| Model | RX-3 | CL |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 150 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4826 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2715 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 65 L |
