1976 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2008 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2008 Mazda B2300 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 2,266 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda B2300 (144 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda RX-3 | 2008 Mazda B2300 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | RX-3 | B2300 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2266 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 62 L |