1976 Mazda RX-4 vs. 1997 Rover 414i
To start off, 1997 Rover 414i is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-4 (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-4 should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Rover 414i weights approximately 350 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-4.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Rover 414i, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Rover 414i (167 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-4. (165 Nm). This means 1997 Rover 414i will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-4.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Mazda RX-4 | 1997 Rover 414i | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | RX-4 | 414i |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1399 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 103 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1460 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2780 mm |
