1976 Mazda RX-4 vs. 2005 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2005 Toyota RunX is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-4 (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2005 Toyota RunX. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-4 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota RunX.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda RX-4 (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota RunX. (128 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1976 Mazda RX-4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota RunX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Mazda RX-4 | 2005 Toyota RunX | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | RX-4 | RunX |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1110 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2610 mm |
