1976 Mazda RX-4 vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-4 (114 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-4 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mazda RX-4 | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | RX-4 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1976 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2490 mm |