1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111 vs. 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111 would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (374 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111. (276 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111 | 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Chevrolet |
| Model | C 111 | TrailBlazer |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2999 cc | 4157 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 269 HP |
| Torque | 276 Nm | 374 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 102 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1910 mm |
