1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111 vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111 (276 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (245 Nm). This means 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Mercedes-Benz C 111 | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Cadillac |
| Model | C 111 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2999 cc | 2597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 179 HP |
| Torque | 276 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 83.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 79.6 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1800 mm |
