1976 Mercury Cougar vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mercury Cougar (152 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1976 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mercury Cougar | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mercury | Ford |
Model | Cougar | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5766 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2490 mm |