1976 Mini MK III vs. 2004 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2004 Toyota Camry is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mini MK III would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Camry (161 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1976 Mini MK III. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1976 Mini MK III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Camry weights approximately 830 kg more than 1976 Mini MK III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Camry (220 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mini MK III. (61 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mini MK III.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Mini MK III | 2004 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Mini | Toyota |
| Model | MK III | Camry |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 61 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2800 mm |
