1976 Mini MK III vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mini MK III would be higher. At 999 cc (3 cylinders), 2009 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Smart ForTwo (70 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1976 Mini MK III. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1976 Mini MK III.
Because 2009 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Mini MK III, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Smart ForTwo (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mini MK III. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Smart ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mini MK III.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mini MK III | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Mini | Smart |
Model | MK III | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 61 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 1870 mm |