1976 Mini MK IV vs. 2012 Jaguar XF

To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 203 more horse power than 1976 Mini MK IV. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1976 Mini MK IV.

Because 2012 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 439 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mini MK IV. 2012 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1976 Mini MK IV has manual transmission. 1976 Mini MK IV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: