1976 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP) has 203 more horse power than 1976 Mitsubishi Lancer. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1976 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 861 kg more than 1976 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mitsubishi Lancer. (105 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Cadillac |
| Model | Lancer | CTS |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1439 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 270 HP |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2880 mm |
