1976 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1976 Mitsubishi Minica. (27 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1976 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2009 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Mitsubishi Minica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1976 Mitsubishi Minica has manual transmission. 1976 Mitsubishi Minica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Mitsubishi Minica | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Minica | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 359 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2490 mm |