1976 Nissan 240 C vs. 2013 Ford Escape
To start off, 2013 Ford Escape is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Escape weights approximately 332 kg more than 1976 Nissan 240 C.
Because 1976 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Escape, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Ford Escape has automatic transmission and 1976 Nissan 240 C has manual transmission. 1976 Nissan 240 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford Escape will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Nissan 240 C | 2013 Ford Escape | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | 240 C | Escape |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 176 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1592 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4524 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2078 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2690 mm |
