1976 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1965 Skoda 1202
To start off, 1976 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Nissan Bluebird (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1965 Skoda 1202. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1965 Skoda 1202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Skoda 1202 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1976 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Nissan Bluebird (133 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Skoda 1202. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1976 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Nissan Bluebird | 1965 Skoda 1202 | |
Make | Nissan | Skoda |
Model | Bluebird | 1202 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2690 mm |