1976 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2010 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Nissan Bluebird (120 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2010 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 2010 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Nissan Bluebird (167 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1976 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Nissan | Proton |
| Model | Bluebird | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2610 mm |
