1976 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,770 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 146 kg more than 1976 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1976 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Nissan Bluebird | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Nissan | Honda |
| Model | Bluebird | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1770 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1056 kg | 1202 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2436 mm |
